Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6175915
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T00:00:26+00:00 2026-05-24T00:00:26+00:00

A dumb question: Let’s say I have an object that i store in viewstate.

  • 0

A dumb question: Let’s say I have an object that i store in viewstate. I have it marked as Serializable. I also reuse the same object in my WCF service. But the web service serializes and exposes some internal properties that are not necessary/safe to display to a service client. Is there a way to allow field/property serialization for ViewState but not Web Service? [NonSerialized] hides properties from both.
I know I can implement a POCO for web service use, but I wanted to keep method/object signatures unchanged as far as the class names.
Just wonder if there’s a way. If not, i’m gonna have to either live without those fields in ViewState or create POCOs and let customers worry about reimplementing their clients.

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T00:00:27+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 12:00 am

    Yes, when creating a DataContract for a web service, you mark the members you want to be included in the service requests and replies with the [DataMember] attribute.

    [DataContract]
    [Serializable]
    public class MyData
    {
        private int id_value;
    
        // Apply the DataMemberAttribute to the property.
        [DataMember]
        public int ID
        {
    
            get { return id_value; }
            set { id_value = value; }
        }
    
        public int DontExposeMeToWcf { get; set; }
    }
    

    Edit: In .NET 4.0 you can also use the [IgnoreDataMember] Attribute to exclude a member from serialization. From Using Data Contracts:

    By default, the DataContractSerializer
    infers the data contract and serializes all publicly visible types.
    All public read/write properties and fields of the type are
    serialized. You can opt out members from serialization by using the
    IgnoreDataMemberAttribute.

    The IgnoreDataMemberAttribute attribute is only honored when used with
    unmarked types. This includes types that are not marked with one of
    the DataContractAttribute, SerializableAttribute,
    CollectionDataContractAttribute, or EnumMemberAttribute attributes, or
    marked as serializable by any other means (such as IXmlSerializable).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Dumb question. Lets say I have a bunch of person objects with their fields
Simple, probably dumb question: Suppose I have a Java server that stores in memory
Dumb question I'm sure, but why does Entity Framework EntityDataSource object require the where
I have a (potentially dumb) question about the C++ STL. When I make a
Maybe this is a dumb question, but I have the following behavior in Visual
It seems like a dumb question, and yet. It could be my IDE that's
Let me share the following scenario: I have a ASP.NET intranet Web-based application that
Me again with a dumb question/scenario I need advice on. I have the following
Let's say I have a constructor Alpha: //[#1] Alpha = function(a,b){ attrib1 = a;
Let's say I have a C# type : class MyType<T> { T Value {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.