Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8355537
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T09:53:35+00:00 2026-06-09T09:53:35+00:00

Are class declarations that are initially set, internally the same as setting them in

  • 0

Are class declarations that are initially set, internally the same as setting them in the constructor?

example:

class test
{
     int test1 = 5;
}

Is there any difference between that and

class test
{
     int test1;
     public test()
     {
         test1 = 5;
     }
}  

If there is no difference, which is more correct to do?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T09:53:36+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 9:53 am

    For most purposes, you can consider the two styles of member initialization functionally equivalent.

    However, you should keep in mind that assignments made in the member declarations execute before any constructors execute. As Jon Skeet points out in comments, this difference in timing can create observable artifacts if virtual methods are called from base constructors.

    “Correctness” is a matter of opinion. For simple integer values the initial value assignments seem innocuous enough, but when you get into more complex types like dates or other full-on objects, the clutter factor starts to rise.

    For myself, I generally prefer to see initialization performed as explicit assignment statements in the body of the constructor, not scattered all over the class in declarations.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know that .h file is supposed to have: class declarations, function prototypes, and
Paragraph 7.3.3. of C++2003 standard states that Using declaration for a class member shall
I have a function B that has this declaration: public void B(Class<? extends C>
What is the difference between these two class declarations? I don't understand why @class
For years I've been coding C++ in the standard way, with class declarations in
A traditional C++ class (just some random declarations) might resemble the following: class Foo
What is the difference between the following two declarations? Class.method = function () {
Why does C++ have public members that anyone can call and friend declarations that
Looking at some code examples for HtmlHelpers , and I see declarations that look
I've read a few posts on this, but there's still one thing that's not

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.