Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 391495
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T16:04:01+00:00 2026-05-12T16:04:01+00:00

As a git noob trying it out on a Rails project, I am wondering

  • 0

As a git noob trying it out on a Rails project, I am wondering if it is bad practice to do git add . (add current directory) before every commit. The intro tutorials I have seen show adding the current directory initially, then using git add new_file to add files after that. If I’m adding a bunch of files from a bunch of different directories, this seems too hard.

Essentially, if you are adding more than one or two files, is it OK to use git add . every time I want to commit? Is using git add . the same as explicitly doing git add new_file for every file that has been created since the last commit?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T16:04:02+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 4:04 pm

    git add . will add everything that’s in the heirarchy, including new files. If you want to track all files that are in the directory, this is fine.

    Another (perhaps more common) usage is to do git commit -a, which adds only the files that changed since the last commit before committing, and doesn’t include any new files.

    EDIT: git add . won’t remove any files that were deleted since the last commit. If you’re deleting files, I’d use git rm <myfile> so that git is informed of the removed file, and you don’t forget to make sure git knows it was deleted. As mentioned in another comment, git commit -a will notice files that have been deleted.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.