Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8318461
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T21:58:55+00:00 2026-06-08T21:58:55+00:00

Assuming I have some array in heap doesn’t matter constructed by malloc or new

  • 0

Assuming I have some array in heap doesn’t matter constructed by malloc or new. I need the most efficient way to enlarge it. I mean if it has enough free space which lying after already allocated data can I keep my data untouched. Is it possible to maintain in C++?

Does realloc work in such manner?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T21:58:58+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 9:58 pm

    Yes, realloc is what you are looking for. Note that it won’t work with new, you will have to use malloc (or, say, calloc). Also, sometimes it is just impossible to extend memory, so realloc will try to do it for you, but if it couldn’t — it will resort to allocating new memory, copying your contents to a new place and freeing the old memory.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Assuming some hashes in the array only have path a.b or {a=>{b=>someanswer}} , how
I have come across some strange behaviour, and I'm assuming a bug in Firefox,
assuming I have the following array: views = [ { :user_id => 1, :viewed_at
I have created an array object with some dummy properties, I have have also
I'm having trouble converting an array into correctly nested HTML. Assuming I have an
I have some numbers, encoded in byte array using variable-length code. Actually it's GIF89a
Assuming I have a list of financial transactions, I have a need to execute
I have some code that takes an array of url's and I have one
Assuming I have a numerical string: var foo = 0; Assume I want to
Assuming I have a ASP.NET MVC 3 application that runs in a web farm

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.