Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4574674
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T19:57:20+00:00 2026-05-21T19:57:20+00:00

Assuming no further modifications or additions will be made to the following type, is

  • 0

Assuming no further modifications or additions will be made to the following type, is there any advantage to doing this one way vs. the other (apart from the less typing and better readability and efficiency of the second example)?

    type MyType<'T> (_initVal : 'T) =
        let getSetFns () =
            let value = ref _initVal
            (fun () -> value.Value), (fun _value -> value := _value)
        let getVal, setVal = getSetFns ()
        member this.Value with get () = getVal () and set _value = setVal _value

… or…

    type MyType<'T> (_initVal : 'T) =
        let value = ref _initVal
        member this.Value with get () = value.Value and set _value = value := _value
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T19:57:21+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 7:57 pm

    The second one is shorter, so I’d go for that. You may want to consider using let mutable rather than a reference cell, it will be slightly more performant (though it’s unlikely you’ll notice much difference).

    To give a little more context, using closures to hide values, as you do in the first case, is a good technique, but here the value is already hidden, so why bother hiding it again ?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm assuming this isn't possible but before digging further is there a way to
Assuming: std::string ToShow,NumStr; The following displays This is 19 ch00: ToShow = This is
http://plus.google.com/robots.txt has the following contents: User-agent: * Disallow: /_/ I'm assuming this means search
Assuming that I have this: enum { A = 0x2E, B = 0x23, C
assuming I have the following array: views = [ { :user_id => 1, :viewed_at
Assuming that the larger a database gets, the longer it will take to SELECT
Assuming that I have the following interface and class: public interface IFooRepo : IDisposable
Further to this question I've got a supplementary problem. I've found a track with
So in my postgres DB I have the following custom type: create type my_pg_type
Assuming the following Model: class Model < ActiveRecord::Base def initialize(*args) super self.du = 1000

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.