Question

Disclaimer: I am using ExtJS 3, but I don’t think it’s very relevant to the question, outside of the common use of it’s namespacing function.

I have a singleton that’s declared in a really long namespace like this:

Ext.ns("REALLY.REALLY.LONG.NAMESPACE");

var Singleton = (function() {   
    var foo = {
        bar: "baz"
    }; 

    var privateFunction = function(param){
        // ...
        return foo;
    };

    var single = Ext.extend(Object, {
        constructor: function(config) {
            Ext.apply(this, config);
        },
        otherFunction: privateFunction,     
        publicFunction: function (someObject){
            // do stuff with someObject
        }
    });

    return single;

})();
// Make it a singleton
REALLY.REALLY.LONG.NAMESPACE.Singleton = new Singleton();

I use it in other modules via calls like REALLY.REALLY.LONG.NAMESPACE.Singleton.otherFunction(); and REALLY.REALLY.LONG.NAMESPACE.Singleton.publicFunction(myObject); . I’m wondering if I can swap out those calls by setting up the client module with an alias to the singleton, i.e. var singleton = REALLY.REALLY.LONG.NAMESPACE.Singleton; , so that I can call singleton.otherFunction();. I’m wondering if this is an anti-pattern , or if there are any pitfalls (memory?) I might run into through this usage.

Thanks StackOverflow!

Answer 1

I’m wondering if I can swap out those calls by setting up the client module with an alias to the singleton

Yes, you can.

I’m wondering if this is an anti-pattern , or if there are any pitfalls (memory?) I might run into through this usage.

No, there aren’t any that I can think of and it is faster than calling the fully-qualified version.

Local Alias Pattern

---

Example:

function somefunc(){
    var singleton = REALLY.REALLY.LONG.NAMESPACE.Singleton;

    singleton.publicFunction();
};

Or:

(function somfunc(singleton){

}(REALLY.REALLY.LONG.NAMESPACE.Singleton));

---

Test Results:

http://jsfiddle.net/jMg9A/