Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 659681
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T23:04:18+00:00 2026-05-13T23:04:18+00:00

Do you know how strong VLIW architectures support exists in GCC compiler infrastructure? I

  • 0

Do you know how strong VLIW architectures support exists in GCC compiler infrastructure? I know that there are some VLIW architectures supported by GCC. Looking at them, it seems that the pipeline optimizations are left to another optimization layer. Are there good (not GCC internals doc) materials on this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T23:04:18+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 11:04 pm

    There indeed are VLIW targets supported by GCC: on the current trunk, this includes at least FRV, MeP and picoChip. The support include optimization. As they are not “mainstream” targets (i.e. primary or secondary targets), there might be some suboptimal code generation for them in some cases.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know there are libs in other languages that can take a string that
I don't know how strong the support of RadControls over here is, but it
I have a strong feeling that I do not know what pattern or particular
I don't know enough to change the following so that it only puts <strong>
Well I know it's not evil just not as pretty in semantics as <strong>
For instance, does the compiler know to translate string s = test + this
Well, I don't know if strong naming is the right term, but what I
Ok, so i know how to strong name an assembly and regasm it, so
Strong typing is fine and dandy when you know what your schema is going
I know that it's possible to determine the data connection type (WIFI/or cellular) through

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.