Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 990395
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T05:56:32+00:00 2026-05-16T05:56:32+00:00

Do you see a way to specify that my result type have to be

  • 0

Do you see a way to specify that my result type have to be MonadType< arg type > within this interface ?

interface IMonad<MonadType>  //  where MonadType : GenricType<>
{
    MonadType<T1> unit<T1>(T1 t)
    Func<MonadType<T1>, MonadType<T2>> map<T1, T2>(Func<T1, T2> f);
}

I get as an error :
The type parameter ‘MonadType’ cannot be used with type arguments

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T05:56:33+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 5:56 am

    No, you can’t do this with .NET generics. What you want to do is to specify that the MonadType type parameter must itself have one generic parameter; the .NET type system can’t represent that constraint.

    Here’s one approach to faking generic monads in C#: http://sandersn.com/blog//index.php/2010/04/23/faking-type-classes-in-c

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following 1-liner that I use to see who might be a
Is there a way to specify that I want the bars of a stacked
I want to know if there is a way to specify that in multiple
I have a result like this { Errors : { Failure : { ShowAsPopup
Is there a way to specify that a model (or app, even) should only
I see a way to configure the DefaultHost with BusConfiguration(), but do not see
I don't see a way to get the maximum capacity of a bounded buffer
Is there a best (see below) way to append two byte arrays in C#?
I would like to see best way of posting to Facebook from a HTML
I use JSBridge to call Objective-C functions from JavaScript. I see no way to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.