Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
For example, {include 'path/to/template.tpl'}?
There’s no mention in the documentation of said format, but it seems to work identically to:
{include file='path/to/template.tpl'}
Is this a quirk, or by design? I prefer the tidier syntax for when I’m not passing additional vars, but want to be sure it’s an accepted format (ver. 3.0.7).
{include "foo"},{extend "foo"}etc. are shorthand notations (deliberately) introduced in Smarty3. It is safe to use them. There are a bunch of these, e.g.{foreach $foo as $bar}(compared to{foreach from=$foo item="bar"}). They don’t differ performance-wise, so it really just boils down to your personal / team preference.