Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 344257
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T10:58:25+00:00 2026-05-12T10:58:25+00:00

For example this article introduces them. What is the benefit? Static analysis seems cool

  • 0

For example this article introduces them.

What is the benefit?

Static analysis seems cool but at the same time it would prevent the ability to pass null as a parameter in unit test. (if you followed the example in the article that is)

While on the topic of unit testing – given how things are now surely there is no point for code contracts if you already practice automated testing?

Update

Having played with Code Contracts I’m a little disappointed. For example, based on the code in the accepted answer:

public double CalculateTotal(Order order)
{
    Contract.Requires(order != null);
    Contract.Ensures(Contract.Result<double>() >= 0);
    return 2.0;
}

For unit testing, you still have to write tests to ensure that null cannot be passed, and the result is greater than or equal to zero if the contracts are business logic. In other words, if I was to remove the first contract, no tests would break, unless I had specifically had a test for this feature. This is based on not using the static analysis built into the better (ultimate etc…) editions of Visual Studio however.

Essentially they all boil down to an alternate way of writing traditional if statements. My experience actually using TDD, with Code Contracts shows why, and how I went about it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T10:58:26+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 10:58 am

    I don’t think unit testing and contracts interfere with each other that much, and if anything contracts should help unit testing since it removes the need to add tedious repetitive tests for invalid arguments. Contracts specify the minimum you can expect from the function, whereas unit tests attempt to validate the actual behaviour for a particular set of inputs. Consider this contrived example:

    
    public class Order
    {
        public IEnumerable Items { get; }
    }
    
    public class OrderCalculator
    {
        public double CalculateTotal(Order order)
        {
            Contract.Requires(order != null);
            Contract.Ensures(Contract.Result<double>() >= 0);
    
            return 2.0;
        }
    }
    

    Clearly the code satisfies the contract, but you’d still need unit testing to validate it actually behaves as you’d expect.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Taking this article on classes and structs as an example: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173109.aspx namespace ProgrammingGuide {
This example is from php.net: <?php function Test() { static $a = 0; echo
In this example the .Stub returns a new memory stream. The same memory stream
I am having a problem with the example from this article . The article
I found out this article I would like share with you. http://10rem.net/articles/net-naming-conventions-and-programming-standards---best-practices Naming convention
I want to try out the example code from this article: Load Recovery.gov Grant
Having read this article I tried to reproduce the example on my Mac. However
I saw this article on msdn with the example http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xfhwa508.aspx So i decided to
This article is similar to my needs, but I'm more curious about a specific
I've read this article, but it's for Rails 1.x. I'd really like to create

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.