Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8293263
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T13:45:50+00:00 2026-06-08T13:45:50+00:00

For verbose debug messages in my application I’m using a function that returns a

  • 0

For verbose debug messages in my application I’m using a function that returns a helpful prefix. Consider the following example:

import inspect

def get_verbose_prefix():
    """Returns an informative prefix for verbose debug output messages"""
    s = inspect.stack()
    module_name = inspect.getmodulename(s[1][1])
    func_name = s[1][3]

    return '%s->%s' % (module_name, func_name)

def awesome_function_name():
    print "%s: Doing some awesome stuff right here" % get_verbose_prefix()

if __name__ == '__main__':
    awesome_function_name()

This outputs:

test->awesome_function_name: Doing some awesome stuff right here

My issue is: When I have a module in a package, for instance ‘myproject.utilities.input’, the module name returned from get_verbose_prefix is still just ‘input’, not ‘myproject.utilities.input’. This drastically reduces the helpfulness of the prefix in large projects when there can be several ‘input’ modules in different submodules all working together.

So my question is: Is there a simple way of retrieving the full module name within it’s package in Python? I’m planning on expanding the get_verbose_prefix function to check for ‘__init__.py’ files in the parent directories of the module to extrapolate it’s full name, but first I’d like to know if there’s an easier way to do it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T13:45:51+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 1:45 pm

    __name__ always contains the full name of the module. (Other than __main__ on main, of course.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm marking verbose log entries like this: Logger.Write(new LogEntry { Message = Using debug
By default, any named function that has the [CmdletBinding()] attribute accepts the -debug and
When using log4perl , the debug log layout that I'm using is : log4perl.appender.D10.layout=PatternLayout
I am running PHP unit as follows: phpunit --debug --verbose --coverage-clover=/tmp/test.xml and get the
Atomikos is quite verbose when used. There seems to be lots of INFO messages
In the following examples: the first seems more verbose but less wasteful of resources
In C#, function overloading has historically appeared something like the following, where each overload
what is good practice for generating verbose output? currently, i have a function bool
In the google style guidelines at http://source.android.com/source/code-style.html#log-sparingly , you are told to wrap verbose/debug
I'm developing an Android application with native code. I don't know how to debug

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.