Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1034107
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T14:20:18+00:00 2026-05-16T14:20:18+00:00

Given the two code examples which is preferred? In the first the return variable

  • 0

Given the two code examples which is preferred? In the first the return variable is defined as a local variable. In the second the return variable is passed by the caller. Are you allowed to define a function and return a variable that was passed to it? I’s this simply a preference of one or the other? is there a performance difference?

float compute_diam(float circumference, float pi) {

float rval;

/* Circumference = pi * diameter, so
   diameter = circumference / pi */

rval = circumference / pi;

return rval;
}

and

float compute_diam(float circumference, float pi, float rval) {

/* Circumference = pi * diameter, so
   diameter = circumference / pi */

rval = circumference / pi;

return rval;
}

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T14:20:18+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:20 pm

    I think in these two cases the 1st one is better for following reason
    1. Due to performance as you are passing variable by value it is once created where ever you declare rval, and once when you pass that rval to function with value of first rval copied to second.

    instead if you want to pass variable in this manner pass it by reference as

    void main()
    {
    float result;
    compute_diam(2.1, 3.14, &result);
     } 
    void compute_diam(float circumference, float pi, float* rval) {
    
    /* Circumference = pi * diameter, so
       diameter = circumference / pi */
    
    *rval = circumference / pi;
    
    
    }
    

    after completion of the function variable result will hold the value of diameter.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Has Java always maintained source-code backward compatibility during its development? More precisely: given two
Given the Java code below, what's the closest you could represent these two static
Given two arrays, how to find the maximum element which is common to both
You are given two sorted integer arrays, which have some common integers. Any common
Is the order in which arguments are passed into a method (in Java) defined?
Given two data frames: C1<-c(3,4,4,4,5) C2<-c(3,7,3,4,5) C3<-c(5,6,3,7,4) DF<-data.frame(C1=C1,C2=C2,C3=C3) DF C1 C2 C3 1 3
Given two tuples of the same arity, how can I lexicographically compare them? It
Given two sorted arrays of integers, a and b , and an integer c
Given two strings text1 and text2 : public SOMEUSABLERETURNTYPE Compare(string text1, string text2) {
Given two identical boost::variant instances a and b , the expression ( a ==

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.