Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8372319
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T14:23:59+00:00 2026-06-09T14:23:59+00:00

Here’s a scenario: [ProtoContract] class A{} A while later another dev adds: class B

  • 0

Here’s a scenario:

[ProtoContract]
class A{}

A while later another dev adds:

class B : A {
  int m;
}

I have a fallback to XML if a class doesn’t have ProtoContractAttribute or had errors during Google Protocol Buffers serialization.
The problem with the code above is that B inherent ProtoContractAttribute from A (note Inherited = true below), but member ‘m’ will not be serialized since it does not have ProtoMemberAttribute.

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class | AttributeTargets.Struct | AttributeTargets.Enum 
| AttributeTargets.Interface, AllowMultiple = false, Inherited = true)]
public sealed class ProtoContractAttribute : Attribute
{...}

It would be great to be able to add:

[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, Inherited = true)]
public class ProtoContractWithoutInheritance : ProtoBuf.ProtoContractAttribute
{
}

But ProtoContractAttribute is sealed, and even if it hadn’t been sealed, ProtoBuf-Net is looking for the explicit type:

if (item.AttributeType.FullName == "ProtoBuf.ProtoContractAttribute")
{...}

Any solution / workaround?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T14:24:01+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 2:24 pm

    Well, the simplest workaround I can think of is:

    bool isProto = Attribute.IsDefined(
        yourType, typeof(ProtoContractAttribute), false);
    

    However, I am also investigating what breaks if we make that non-inherited. Something looks a bit wrong with that being inherited!

    Edit: this should also be fixed from r571 onwards; the attribute is not marked as inherited now.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Here's my scenario - I have an SSIS job that depends on another prior
Here is my class: public class A{ private void doIt(int[] X, int[] Y){ //change
Here's the view: @if (stream.StreamSourceId == 1) { <img class=source src=@Url.Content(~/Public/assets/images/own3dlogo.png) alt= /> }
Here is the Javascript I currently have <script type=text/javascript> $(function() { $('.slideshow').hover( function() {
Here is my SQL script CREATE TABLE tracks( track_id int NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, account_id
Here is the scenario. I'm writing my geo-ruby oracle adapter for Ruby On Rails
Here's the basic setup: I have a thin bar at the top of a
Here is my persistence.xml : <?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?> <persistence xmlns=http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance xsi:schemaLocation=http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_1_0.xsd version=1.0>
Here is my problem : I have a post controller with the action create.
Here's my Manifest: <?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?> <manifest xmlns:android=http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android package=com.mappp.mobile android:versionCode=1 android:versionName=1.0 > <supports-screens android:largeScreens=true

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.