Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1060681
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T18:21:49+00:00 2026-05-16T18:21:49+00:00

I already found an answer here on Stack Overflow how to include a 3rd

  • 0

I already found an answer here on Stack Overflow how to include a 3rd party JAR in a project without installing it to a “local repository”:

Can I add jars to maven 2 build classpath without installing them?

But, when I use the Maven Shade Plugin to create a JAR that includes all the dependencies of the project as well, the 3rd party JAR is not included automatically.

How can I make the Maven Shade Plugin add such a 3rd party JAR in to the shaded JAR?


As per the answer gotten, I made it work. What I did was, added this snippet to the beginning of my pom.xml:

<repositories>
  <repository>
    <id>repo</id>
    <url>file://${basedir}/repo</url>
  </repository>
</repositories>

Then added a dependency for my project, also to pom.xml:

<dependencies>
  <dependency>
    <groupId>dummy</groupId>
    <artifactId>dummy</artifactId>
    <version>0.0.0</version>
    <scope>compile</scope>
  </dependency>
</dependencies>

And then ran a command line to add a package to ‘repo’:

mvn org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install-file
    -Dfile=<my-jar>.jar -DgroupId=dummy -DartifactId=dummy
    -Dversion=0.0.0 -Dpackaging=jar -DlocalRepositoryPath=`pwd`/repo/

(Not sure if the repo path needs to be a full path, but didn’t want to take chances.)

The contents of the repo subdirectory is now:

repo/dummy/dummy/0.0.0/dummy-0.0.0.jar
repo/dummy/dummy/0.0.0/dummy-0.0.0.pom
repo/dummy/dummy/maven-metadata-local.xml

Now I can check this in to version control, and have no local or remote dependencies.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T18:21:50+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 6:21 pm

    But, when I use the Maven Shade Plugin to create a JAR that includes all the dependencies of the project as well, the 3rd party JAR is not included automatically.

    Yes, because the system scoped dependencies are assumed to be always present (this is exactly what the system scope is about) so they won’t be included. People actually don’t understand what system scope dependencies are, they just keep abusing them (yes, this is abuse), and then get side effects and wonder why (as Brian pointed out in his answer).

    I already wrote many, many, really many times about this here on SO and in 99% of the cases, system scoped dependencies should be avoided. And I’ll repeat what the Dependency Scopes mini guide says one more time:

    • system: This dependency is required in some phase of your project’s lifecycle, but is system-specific. Use of this scope is discouraged: This is considered an “advanced” kind of feature and should only be used when you truly understand all the ramifications of its use, which can be extremely hard if not actually impossible to quantify. This scope by definition renders your build non-portable. It may be necessary in certain edge cases. The system scope includes the <systemPath> element which points to the physical location of this dependency on the local machine. It is thus used to refer to some artifact expected to be present on the given local machine an not in a repository; and whose path may vary machine-to-machine. The systemPath element can refer to environment variables in its path: ${JAVA_HOME} for instance.

    So, instead of using the system scope, either:

    • Add your libraries to your local repository via install:install-file. This is a quick and dirty way to get things working, it might be an option if you’re alone but it makes your build non portable.
    • Install and run an “enterprise repository” like Nexus, Archiva, or Artifactory and add your libraries via deploy:deploy-file. This is the ideal scenario.
    • Setup a file based repository as described in this previous answer and put your libraries in there. This is the best compromise if you don’t have a corporate repository but need to work as a team and don’t want to sacrifice portability.

    Please, stop using the system scope.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This question to which I already found the answer is posted here in case
I did a search here already, and haven't found a clear answer to my
I know there are already many questions like mine but I found no answer
The title is my question. I already found a topic related to this here
Not a real question because I already found out the answer, but still interesting
Since I haven't found an answer to the question asked previously here I'm trying
I'm already searching for 2 hours now, and still haven't found an answer to
This question may be beyond the scope of a simple answer here at stack
This question was here already but there was no answer, so trying one more
First, yes I have searched already and found this answer already: GWT JSNI -

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.