Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8332425
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T02:43:14+00:00 2026-06-09T02:43:14+00:00

I already have a few procedures intending to be used as C++ methods written

  • 0

I already have a few procedures intending to be used as C++ methods written in Assembly (with proper calling convention and name mangling). However, when I try to use them

class Foo {
    extern void foo();
}

I get “invalid storage class for a class member.” How can I properly externally define a C++ method?

One workaround is to generate a thunk defining the method which simply calls the assembly version, using inline assembly to support the thiscall convention. In fact, I already have code to generate these. However, I’d really like to get this more direct method working.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T02:43:16+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 2:43 am

    Just leave off the extern. Functions are externally visible by default.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've seen that a few instances of this problem have been raised already. However,
I have question regarding disabling browser caching. I have already found few solutions, and
I already know quite a few tricks with Android java and I have an
Let's say I have few aspects, which I have already compiled, and now I
I already have a few rules set up redirecting users, like none www to
I have written a few small utility applications in Clojure that I compile into
I have a sinks::text_file_backend sink. Say I already have a few rotated log files:
Hey there i already have quite a few rewriting working on a project, but
I already have my azure web role running in cloud using azure sdk 1.6.
We already have the database with real data inside. Now we want to build

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.