Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8311135
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T19:42:45+00:00 2026-06-08T19:42:45+00:00

I am investigating nodejs/socket.io for real time chat, and I need some advice for

  • 0

I am investigating nodejs/socket.io for real time chat, and I need some advice for implementing rooms.

Which is better, using namespace or using the room feature to completely isolate grops of chatters from each other?

what is the real technical difference between rooms and namespace?

Is there any resource usage difference?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T19:42:46+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 7:42 pm

    This is what namespaces and rooms have in common (socket.io v0.9.8 – please note that v1.0 involved a complete rewrite, so things might have changed):

    • Both namespaces (io.of(‘/nsp’)) and rooms (socket.join(‘room’)) are created on the server side
    • Multiple namespaces and multiple rooms share the same (WebSocket) connection
    • The server will transmit messages over the wire only to those clients that connected to / joined a nsp / room, i.e. it’s not just client-side filtering

    The differences:

    • namespaces are connected to by the client using io.connect(urlAndNsp) (the client will be added to that namespace only if it already exists on the server)
    • rooms can be joined only on the server side (although creating an API on the server side to enable clients to join is straightforward)
    • namespaces can be authorization protected
    • authorization is not available with rooms, but custom authorization could be added to the aforementioned, easy-to-create API on the server, in case one is bent on using rooms
    • rooms are part of a namespace (defaulting to the ‘global’ namespace)
    • namespaces are always rooted in the global scope

    To not confuse the concept with the name (room or namespace), I’ll use compartment to refer to the concept, and the other two names for the implementations of the concept. So if you

    • need per-compartment authorization, namespaces might be the easiest route to take
    • if you want hierarchically layered compartments (2 layers max), use a namespace/room combo
    • if your client-side app consists of different parts that (do not themselves care about compartments but) need to be separated from each other, use namespaces.

    An example for the latter would be a large client app where different modules, perhaps developed separately (e.g. third-party), each using socket.io independently, are being used in the same app and want to share a single network connection.

    Not having actually benchmarked this, it seems to me if you just need simple compartments in your project to separate and group messages, either one is fine.

    Not sure if that answers your question, but the research leading up to this answer at least helped me see clearer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm just investigating some memory leaks in my app, I'm using Xcode 4.0.2. I've
I am investigating AUTHENTICATION_FAILED error which occurs when I regist C2DM by using the
I'm investigating a serious performance problem in my OSGi-based application which is using Eclipselink
Last some days i am investigating the better way to implement the chatting on
Background: I'm investigating anonymous recursion, and I'm taking on the challenge of implementing the
I am investigating creating cross platform mobile apps using PhoneGap. I have looked at
Whilst 'investigating' finalisation (read: trying stupid things) I stumbled across some unexpected behaviour (to
I'm investigating Adobe CQ5 and would like any advice on how to integrate its
I was investigating some framework code (the System.AppDomain.GetDynamicDir method) and this was all the
I'm investigating using SCons for our build process as we develop C++ for multiple

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.