Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 270715
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T00:02:47+00:00 2026-05-12T00:02:47+00:00

I am wondering why the following two types struct { double re[2]; }; and

  • 0

I am wondering why the following two types

struct {
    double re[2];
};

and

double re[2];

have the same size in C? Doesn’t struct add a bit of size overhead?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 4 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T00:02:48+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 12:02 am

    No, it just merely composes all the elements into one higher-level element whose size is merely the individual elements’ sizes added up (plus some padding depending on alignment rules, but that’s out of the scope of this question).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have following two classes: template <size_t size> class Cont{ public: char charArray[size]; };
I'm wondering why the following code doesn't work: String test = new String(new byte[]
I am wondering if the CLR types would return different results from the following:
Situation: One WebApplication, two site collections. Both site collections have the same type and
I'm wondering if the following DB schema would have repercussions later. Let's say I'm
I'm wondering if anyone has faced this issue. Let's assume I have two tables:
I was just wondering what (if any) the difference was between the following two
I have the following two interfaces: public interface ParsedFile<K, V extends FileEntry>{...} And public
I was wondering which one of the following two was the better way of
I have the following primary template: template<size_t pos, size_t lev> struct Sol; and I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.