Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1064533
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T18:57:23+00:00 2026-05-16T18:57:23+00:00

I am writing a small, really simple lisp parser in ruby with the treetop

  • 0

I am writing a small, really simple lisp parser in ruby with the treetop gem just to experiment with it. However, it is not really working out how I want it to, and the documentation is pretty poor so it’s hard to understand what I am doing wrong. Currently, the grammar can match both a symbol and a boolean, but not a number. However, when I switch the order in the atom rule, for example to bool / number / symbol, it still matches for the first two, but not the last one. Is there a limitation in the treetop gem that means you can only have two options in a rule? Also, something like ‘(3)’ still does not parse.

My grammar is as follows:

grammar Lisp
 rule expression
   atom / list
 end

 rule atom
   symbol / bool / number
 end

 rule number
   [0-9]*
 end

 rule bool
   'T' / 'F'
 end

 rule symbol
  [a-zA-Z]*
 end

 rule list
   '(' expression* ')'
 end    
end

I am testing it as they showed in the tutorial, with:

parser = LispParser.new
if parser.parse('T')
  puts "Success"
else
  puts "Fail"
end
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T18:57:26+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 6:57 pm

    The way you defined the rules number and symbol they always match (because * means “zero or more” and you can always find zero of something). This means that if you try to parse “42”, the parser first successfully matches the rule symbol against the empty string at the beginning and then expect no further input.

    To fix this simply replace * with +.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm writing a small Windows application in Visual C++ without MVC. Its really small,
I'm really new to C -> Python interaction and am currently writing a small
I'm working on a small component for writing and reading AT Commands using an
I'm working on a small sample app to get used to writing Ember apps.
I am writing some small program in C--some log in, log out, create account,
I have never really done any serious testing other then writing some simple Java
I am running a really simple query on a really small table (<10 rows,
I'm writing small XMPP server using boost::asio and I want to unit-test my code.
I am writing small app, using Play Framework 2.0 which uses Ebean as ORM.
I have an application where I am reading and writing small blocks of data

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.