Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8323025
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T23:35:09+00:00 2026-06-08T23:35:09+00:00

I currntly have a nameless function in a javascript ajax-call: (This code has been

  • 0

I currntly have a nameless function in a javascript ajax-call:

(This code has been cut down to the essentials, there might be some errors)

function call(name){
    var type = services[name].type


    $.oajax({
        success: function(data) {
            fbposts=data.data
                if (type === "grupp"){
                    var postid=fbposts[fbpost].id.split("_");
                    return "https://www.facebook.com/groups/"+postid[0]+"/permalink/"+postid[1]+'/'
                }
                else if (fbposts[fbpost].actions){
                    return fbposts[fbpost].actions[0].link;
                }
            }
        }       
    })
};

I want to insead use

success: successfunction,

and the reference the function like this:

function success(data) {
            fbposts=data.data
                if (type === "grupp"){
                    var postid=fbposts[fbpost].id.split("_");
                    return "https://www.facebook.com/groups/"+postid[0]+"/permalink/"+postid[1]+'/'
                }
                else if (fbposts[fbpost].actions){
                    return fbposts[fbpost].actions[0].link;
                }
            }
        }       
    })

At this point, the type-variable is no longer defined. Can I somehow solve this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T23:35:12+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 11:35 pm

    One approach that could work is to make use of the context parameter on $.ajax — for example:

    function successFunction(data) {
        fbposts=data.data;
        if (type === "grupp"){
            var postid=fbposts[fbpost].id.split("_");
            return "https://www.facebook.com/groups/"+postid[0]+"/permalink/"+postid[1]+'/'
        }
        else if (fbposts[fbpost].actions){
            return fbposts[fbpost].actions[0].link;
        }
    }
    
    function call(name){
        var type = services[name].type;
        $.oajax({
            success: successFunction,
            context: { type: type }
        );
    }
    

    Using context causes this inside your success function to point to whatever you passed in for context. So in the above example, when within successFunction we read

    if (type ...)
    

    this would mean that type refers to this.type, which is the same value of type that we saved into context from within call.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Currently have this code defining getter/setter for an object's selectedID property. The object is
I currently have this in my code tap = [[UITapGestureRecognizer alloc] initWithTarget:self action:@selector(updateLeftLabel:)]; which
I currently have the following code in an NSOperation that has an observer for
I currently have this script : function addConsultant() { var sheet_staffing = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName(Staffing); var
I currently have this in my document $(document).ready(function(){ $([href$='.html']).addClass('html'); $([href$='.pdf']).addClass('pdf'); }); which styles any
I currently have no code, because I don't know how to do this at
I currently have this code, whcih works and produces the output you would expect,
Currently have a drop down menu that is activated on a hover (from display:none
I currently have 4 tables. Product, Category, SubCategory, ProductSubCategory. Category has a OneToMany SubCategory
I currently have: Range(Z1).Interior.Color = RGB(255, 255, 255) But this wipes out the borders

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.