Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8296159
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T14:52:44+00:00 2026-06-08T14:52:44+00:00

I had a problem where I executed a store procedure that does an update

  • 0

I had a problem where I executed a store procedure that does an update on a few tables in the database. The error was done such that only a single field (representing the same record id) is updated to a new id each time. This is the spoc:

DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS feeds_transfer;
DELIMITER $$
CREATE PROCEDURE feeds_transfer(IN original_owner INT, IN new_owner INT, IN feed_id INT)
    BEGIN
        UPDATE `events` SET `user_id` = new_owner WHERE `user_id` = original_owner AND `feed_id` = feed_id;
        UPDATE `feeds` SET `partner_id` = new_owner WHERE `partner_id` = original_owner AND `id` = feed_id;
    UPDATE `ics_uploads` SET `user_id` = new_owner WHERE `user_id` = original_owner AND `context_type` = 'feed' AND `context_id` = feed_id;
    UPDATE `images` SET `user_id` = new_owner WHERE `user_id` = original_owner AND `context` = 'feed' AND `context_id` = feed_id;
    UPDATE `private_feed_invitees` SET `user_id` = new_owner WHERE `user_id` = original_owner AND `feed_id` = feed_id;
        UPDATE `subscribed_feeds` SET `user_id` = new_owner WHERE `user_id` = original_owner AND `feed_id` = feed_id;
    END $$
DELIMITER ;

What happens is that the subscribed_feeds table will update a every record where user_id = original_owner. Its like its ignoring the feed_id = feed_id

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T14:52:46+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 2:52 pm

    Okay so what is happening here is not so much that the feed_id = feed_id clause is being ignored, its that it is always true, and so it always triggers more updates than hoped. The moral of this story is that you should NEVER name the input variables to your stored procedure the same things as any of the fields you plan to do logical checks against.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Had a problem with the recursive conflictCheck() method. That seems fine now. I have
I had a problem with some JavaScript functions that had me scratching my head
I had developed an app in android that take some data from a database
I have a strange problem, I have a logout link that displays only if
I had a Problem to use DotNet 4.0 DLL in a DotNet 2.0 Application,
i had a problem on confusing how to put ontouch inside my coding because
I had a problem with a COM component in .NET. It would instantiate but
I had this problem before and can't for life of me remember how to
I had no problem at all running the following code on a local server,
I had a problem where I had a series of overlapping CATransition / CAAnimation

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.