Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 398949
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T16:47:55+00:00 2026-05-12T16:47:55+00:00

I had come across the following code: typedef struct { double x; double y;

  • 0

I had come across the following code:

typedef struct {
        double x;
        double y;
        double z;
} *vector;

Is this a valid type definition? The code compiles and runs fine. I was just curious if this is common practice.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T16:47:56+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 4:47 pm

    Absolutely valid.
    Usually, you can take full advantage of this way by defining two types together:

    typedef struct
    {
     int a;
     int b;
    } S1, *S1PTR;
    

    Where S1 is a struct and S1PTR is the pointer to this struct.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've been hearing and reading about cases when people had come across cases of
Well, I guess this day had to come. My client's website has been compromised
I have had many requests come in to a project that I work on,
I've had a lot of trouble trying to come up with the best way
I'm on a project doing an iPhone application. We had a Cocoa consultant come
Had a coworker ask me this, and in my brain befuddled state I didn't
(This is technically an addendum to an earlier StackOverflow question I had posted, but
I have come across a very odd problem in C that I have never
In C following this article ( http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2006/12/21/1340571.aspx ), we have succesfully been able to
Had an interesting discussion with some colleagues about the best scheduling strategies for realtime

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.