Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8360577
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T11:30:14+00:00 2026-06-09T11:30:14+00:00

I had this query in Mongoid2 that was working fine: GlobalWord.collection.update({_id => foo}, {$inc

  • 0

I had this query in Mongoid2 that was working fine:

GlobalWord.collection.update({"_id" => "foo"}, {"$inc" => {:count => 1}}, :upsert => true)

If it finds the GlobalWord with the id foo, then it updates its count by one, otherwise it creates a document with the id foo and a count of one. I didn’t find an equivalent for that in mongoid3.

edit: I need the query to be atomic

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T11:30:15+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 11:30 am

    I used
    GlobalWord.create(:id => word).inc(:count, 1)
    which seems to be atomic

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I had this, which was working fine: public static Integer[] photos = new Integer[]
I tried this query below but it still returns days that had -1 values.
I had this select query which worked fine until I performed an inner join.
So really my question is WHY this worked. Anyway, I had this query that
I had written a query like this string strUpdateQuery = UPDATE M_QA SET ANSWER
I have this query, which was working fine. SELECT SUM(amount) FROM company.invoice_line WHERE item_id
Had this working; at one stage. The problem is the following text is now
I had this working at some point, as I had a question about this
I had this nasty bug that disappeared in the past but now after quite
I had this doubt for sometime now, some people say that there's no such

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.