Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8263855
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T04:14:46+00:00 2026-06-08T04:14:46+00:00

I have a C parallel for loop which includes a line like b[i] =

  • 0

I have a C parallel for loop which includes a line like

b[i] = b[0];

so I need to complete the first iteration before starting any other iteration. Is there a clause which enforces such behavior?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T04:14:49+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 4:14 am

    Just pull the first iteration out of the loop and start the loop at index 1. That’s by far the easiest and cheapest way. Other ways involve waiting, which is inefficient.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a Parallel.ForEach() async loop with which I download some webpages. My bandwidth
I have a single-threaded linux app which I would like to make parallel. It
I have a fairly long parallel foreach loop I need to run. Over 100
As you can see below, I have Parallel.For loop. If run the program while
I have a Parallel.ForEach loop running an intensive operation inside the body. The operation
I have a simple Parallel.Foreach loop that has about 1000 rows in the DataTable,
I want to have 3 aligned parallel to each other. I have seen few
I have a loop which should be nicely parallelized by insering one openmp pragma:
I have the following piece of code, which I want to make parallel in
I have two scenarios of measuring metrics like computation time and parallel speedup (sequential_time/parallel_time).

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.