Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 728065
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T06:38:19+00:00 2026-05-14T06:38:19+00:00

I have a mmap typecast to a char pointer char *ptr; ptr = (char

  • 0

I have a mmap typecast to a char pointer

char *ptr;

ptr = (char *)mmap(0, FILESIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);

This was my earlier code. But now I want to use a map instead of char * as the requirements changed.

Now, my map is declared as
map < int, string > i_s_map;

How do I change my mmap call to point to the map?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T06:38:20+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 6:38 am

    You don’t want to store STL containers in shared memory, at least not share them. The reason is that they rely heavily on heap allocation, so out-of-the-box std::map will hold pointers from virtual address space of a different process.

    Take a look at boost::interprocess for a way to deal with this situation in C++.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have allocated code using mmap , but unable to free it because of
I have the following code, ... char* seg = mmap(0, ...) printf(seg=%x\n, seg); ...
So I have the following code, which allocates memory using the mmap linux system
I have mapped a file into memory using mmap . Now I would like
I have a problem with a semaphore in my code. This is a struct
I have an application that can potentially have hundreds of memory mapped, i.e., mmap()
have written this little class, which generates a UUID every time an object of
have a problem. At first look at this HTML <div id=map style=background-image: url(map.png); width:
Mmap returns a void*, but not a volatile void* . If I'm using mmap
Let's say that I routinely have to work with files with an unknown, but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.