Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1044061
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T15:45:59+00:00 2026-05-16T15:45:59+00:00

I have a multiset with a custom predicate function, e.g multiset<MyClass *,MyCompFunc> where MyCompFunc

  • 0

I have a multiset with a custom predicate function, e.g multiset<MyClass *,MyCompFunc> where MyCompFunc looks at an attribute on the MyClass objects. During the progress of the application, the objects might change in a way that should cause them to be reordered.

What’s the correct way to get the multiset to become reordered when this happens? Manually sort it, or remove the modified object, update it, and re-insert it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T15:46:00+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 3:46 pm

    The usual is to remove, update, and re-insert. Virtually anything else at least temporarily violates the primary invariant of a set/multiset, which clearly isn’t a good thing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this: struct myClass{ multiset<string,binPred<string> > values ; myClass(const char param1, const char
I have a std::multiset which stores elements of class A . I have provided
Have a procedure which looks like Procedure TestProc(TVar1, TVar2 : variant); Begin TVar1 :=
I have to partition a multiset into two sets who sums are equal. For
I have: 1) a starting set, a multiset, e.x. { x, y, z, z
I have an application (C++) that I think would be well served by an
I have a join function that operates on STL strings. I want to be
I have multiset < Class1 > myset ; so I create a new object:
have a php code like this,going to convert it in to C#. function isValid($n){
I'm trying to have a (hash-based) Multimap with a (hash-based) Multiset of values for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.