Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3605352
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T21:06:45+00:00 2026-05-18T21:06:45+00:00

I have a program that produces rather vanilla XML documents. The first line of

  • 0

I have a program that produces rather vanilla XML documents.
The first line of such generated documents is

<?xml version="1.1"?>

IE8 and Firefox both object to this, by complaining “Wrong version” and explicitly
pointing to the “1.1” part.

If I patch the first line to say:

<?xml version="1.0"?>

both of them will load/show me document without complaint.

Isn’t XML version 1.1 a standard? Do the browsers really not accept these?
Or is the error message (like with most software error messages) simply misleading and
something else is wrong?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T21:06:45+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:06 pm

    XML 1.1 is not the defacto standard, no. It’s very rarely used, and unless you have a specific reason to use it, you should ignore it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xml

    The second (XML 1.1) was initially published on February 4, 2004, the same day as XML 1.0 Third Edition,[32] and is currently in its second edition, as published on August 16, 2006. It contains features (some contentious) that are intended to make XML easier to use in certain cases.[33] The main changes are to enable the use of line-ending characters used on EBCDIC platforms, and the use of scripts and characters absent from Unicode 3.2. XML 1.1 is not very widely implemented and is recommended for use only by those who need its unique features.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have command-line program that do a lot of work and produce a lot
I have written a program that makes sure each cookie has more than 5
I have a program which produces a fatal error with a testcase, and I
I have the following code that calls the function uint32_pack. This program compiles with
I have a Python program that uses Popen to call a test C++ program.
I have been tasked with making an existing Java program available via a web
I have the following example relationship: namespace Yesod { public class Program { //
I have finger painting stuff on one view of my app. When the user
Please have a look at the code below (excerpt from a C# book): public
New to stackoverflow, been very helpful searching, but alas the time has come to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.