Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I have a Ruby gem that is setup with Travis CI, and my configuration currently runs the specs with Ruby 1.8.7, 1.9.2, and 1.9.3, as well as the latest versions of Rails 3.0, 3.1, and 3.2. If the tests are passing in 1.8.7 and 1.9.3, is there any reason to run them in 1.9.2? It seems like overkill if anything that works in both 1.8.7 and 1.9.3 will always work in 1.9.2. Is that assumption correct?
I don’t see a reason, why it shouldn’t work with 1.9.2 — but that’s the thing with testing: you never know. So if it is important to you that your software works with 1.9.2, I would not run the tests automatically and during development, but at least before an important deployment.