Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8247139
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T22:44:32+00:00 2026-06-07T22:44:32+00:00

I have an old table that I’m working with, which looks like this: +——————+————–+——+—–+———+——-+

  • 0

I have an old table that I’m working with, which looks like this:

+------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| Field            | Type         | Null | Key | Default | Extra |
+------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+
| BINARY_DATA_ID   | varchar(255) | NO   | PRI |         |       |
| BINARY_DATA      | longblob     | YES  |     | NULL    |       |
| BINARY_DATA_NAME | varchar(255) | YES  |     | NULL    |       |
+------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+-------+

The main problem with this is that the BinaryData Java class loads the BINARY_DATA column, even if I only require the BINARY_DATA_NAME. I know that the best way to architect this is to split the data from the meta-data (like the file name) so they live in separate tables. From there it’s trivial to make the data lazy-loaded. This is how it should have been done in the first place.

Unfortunately it may not be possible for me to do the above due to organizational constraints. As a workaround, is it possible to make that column lazy-loaded using some annotations instead of splitting things out into separate tables? I’ve modified the BinaryData class so that it has an inner static BinaryDataData class which is @Embedded and the attribute is @Basic(fetch=FetchType.LAZY):

@Entity
@Table
@Proxy(lazy=false)
@Inheritance(strategy=InheritanceType.JOINED)
public class BinaryData implements Serializable, Persistable<BinaryData>, Cloneable {

    private static final long serialVersionUID = /** blah */;

    @Id @Column @GeneratedValue(generator="uuid") @GenericGenerator(name="uuid", strategy="uuid")
    private String id;

    @Column
    private String binaryDataName;

    @Embedded
    @Basic(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    private BinaryDataData binaryData;

    @Transient
    private String cacheId;

    /**
     * Hibernate constructor
     */
    public BinaryData() { /* Creates a new instance of Attachment. */}

    public BinaryData(byte[] binaryData, String binaryDataName) {
        this.binaryData = new BinaryDataData(ArrayUtils.clone(binaryData));
        this.binaryDataName = binaryDataName;
    }

    /**
     * Returns the BinaryData byte stream.
     *
     * @return binaryData byte stream
     */
    @Embedded
    @Basic(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    public byte[] getBinaryData() {
        if (this.binaryData == null) {
            return new byte[0];
        }
        return binaryData.getActualData();
    }

    @Embeddable
    public static class BinaryDataData implements Serializable {
        @Column(length=32*1024*1024, columnDefinition="longblob", name="BINARY_DATA") @Lob
        private byte[] actualData;

        public BinaryDataData() { }

        public BinaryDataData(byte[] data) {
            this.actualData = data;
        }

        public byte[] getActualData() {
            if (this.actualData == null) {
                return new byte[0];
            }
            return this.actualData;
        }

        public void setBinaryData(byte[] newData) {
            this.actualData = newData;
        }

        @Override public boolean equals(Object obj) {
            if (this == obj) {
                return true;
            }
            if (obj == null) {
                return false;
            }
            if (!(obj instanceof BinaryDataData)) {
                return false;
            }
            final BinaryDataData other = (BinaryDataData) obj;
            if (!Arrays.equals(actualData, other.actualData)) {
                return false;
            }
            return true;
        }
    }

    /** onwards... */

Unfortunately this doesn’t work. The SQL that I’m seeing still shows a complete fetch of the object even if the binary data isn’t requested:

select ideaattach0_.BINARY_DATA_ID as BINARY1_9_, ideaattach0_1_.BINARY_DATA as BINARY2_9_, ideaattach0_1_.BINARY_DATA_NAME as BINARY3_9_, ideaattach0_.IDEA_BUCKET_ID as IDEA2_136_ from IDEA_ATTACHMENT ideaattach0_ inner join BINARY_DATA ideaattach0_1_ on ideaattach0_.BINARY_DATA_ID=ideaattach0_1_.BINARY_DATA_ID where ideaattach0_.BINARY_DATA_ID=?

Any ideas? Thank you.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T22:44:35+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 10:44 pm

    From Hibernate, Chapter 19. Improving performance:

    Lazy attribute fetching: an attribute or single valued association is fetched when the instance variable is accessed. This approach requires buildtime bytecode instrumentation and is rarely necessary.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have a large MyISAM table that is used to archive old data. This
I have MySQL table that doesn't have AUTO_INCREMENT field. In PHP I run this
I have a table tracking daily scores by users. It looks roughly like this:
I have an UPDATE trigger that produces INSERTED and DELETED table like this: INSERTED
I have old code that uses size_t which IIRC comes from cstring.h. On OS
I have a new table that hold old passwords, I need to check if
I have some data from an old table, with a lot of columns that
So I have this SQL table that I need to update. Now we use
I have a table that has old, legacy data along with new data. The
We have an old SQL table that was used by SQL Server 2000 for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.