Question

I have been advised to use the following options with GCC, as it helps to avoid a lot of common errors. It turns on a bunch of warnings and -Werror turns them into errors.

gcc -pedantic -W -Wall -Wextra -Wshadow -Wstrict-overflow=5 -Wwrite-strings -std=c99 -Werror

Given the following test code:

#include <stdio.h>

int main(void)
{
    int arr[8]={0,10,20,30,40,50,60,70};
    int x;

    printf("sizeof(arr): %d\n", sizeof(arr));
    printf("sizeof(int): %d\n", sizeof(int));

    for(x = 0; x < sizeof(arr)/sizeof(int); x++)
    {
        printf("%d\n",arr[x]);
    }

    return 0;
}

I get this:

test.c:11: error: comparison between signed and unsigned

I know that one way I can fix this is turning off the warnings, but they haven’t made me use these settings to turn them off in the end.

Another way is to cast the stuff, but I have been told that casting is deprecated.

Also, I could make x into an unsigned int:

unsigned x;

But it doesn’t solve the general problem when I have to compare signed values with unsigned values using these compiler options. Is there an cleaner way instead of casting?

Answer 1

This really depends on the data type. It is possible to avoid this by implicitly casting the values to a type which contains a superset of all the values available in the signed and unsigned type. For instance you could use a 64 bit signed value to compare an unsigned 32 bit and a signed 32 bit value.

However this is a corner case and you need to do operations like verify the size of your types. Your best solution is to use the same type for both operands.

If you must cast, do consider that you could be causing an overflow and consider if that is important to your application or not.