Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1898748
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T06:48:21+00:00 2026-05-17T06:48:21+00:00

I Have coded a terms and conditions page with numbered paragraphs as follows: <p>1.

  • 0

I Have coded a “terms and conditions” page with numbered paragraphs as follows:

<p>1. content</p>
<p>2. more content</p>
<p>3. even more content</p>

as opposed to:

<ol>
<li>content</li>
<li>more content</li>
<li>even more content</li>
</ol>

I have been told by someone that this is extremely bad practice and is generally wrong.

Now, My question to you lot is – why?

This still validates and it is still picked up by search engines etc.

Am I being stupid or is the other person just being picky?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T06:48:22+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 6:48 am

    It comes down to semantics. Yes the other person was being picky. Yes what you were doing is not the best practice. No, what you’re doing is not WRONG technically, but you can ADD VALUE to the content by using the ordered list.

    Since Ordered List is a tag, it is by definition machine-readable, without any special parsing. Using just 1. 2. etc as plain text embedded withing Paragraph content is not immediately exposed to whatever machine readers / code / other automation might want to work with your content.

    The OL identifies that section of your content as an ordered list. That’s adding (a little) value to the content because now it’s providing a little bit of meta-data about what KIND of content it is. It’s a numbered list.

    I know, you’re saying so what?

    Well, let’s suppose this content is being “read” by a blind person using a text reader software, where the computer reads the HTML page, parses the content and then speaks it to the user. The user may have enabled a setting saying – okay, for every ordered list, i want you to read me one item at a time and then pause and wait for me to say “next”. Or whatever – just an arbitrary example.

    Basically, by providing additional (semantic) information about your content, you are enabling software, devices and other processes to work with your content in more meaningful, contextual ways.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have coded the next function. But surely someone has a more elegant way
The static content has been hard coded in Java files like this: String s
In general terms and pseudo-code, what would be the best way to have a
I have coded a server in Java that will have several clients connected to
I have coded a background logging thread for my program, if a class needs
I have coded my own tiny static DAL class for .NET Compact Framework and
I have coded up an ASP.NET website and running on win'08 (remotely hosted). The
I have coded a view that relies on a scalar function value for one
I have coded my calculator in simple mode, I have added a button for
I have a large system that I have coded and I wish to make

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.