Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5952111
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T17:38:05+00:00 2026-05-22T17:38:05+00:00

I have come across articles that state that SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TABLE_NAME will be

  • 0

I have come across articles that state that SELECT COUNT(*) FROM TABLE_NAME will be slow when the table has lots of rows and lots of columns.

I have a table that might contain even billions of rows [it has approximately 15 columns]. Is there a better way to get the EXACT count of the number of rows of a table?

Please consider the following before your answer:

  • I am looking for a database vendor
    independent solution. It is OK if it
    covers MySQL, Oracle, MS SQL Server.
    But if there is really no database
    vendor independent solution then I
    will settle for different solutions
    for different database vendors.

  • I cannot use any other external tool
    to do this. I am mainly looking for a
    SQL based solution.

  • I cannot normalize my database design
    any further. It is already in 3NF and moreover a
    lot of code has already been written
    around it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T17:38:05+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 5:38 pm

    Simple answer:

    • Database vendor independent solution = use the standard = COUNT(*)
    • There are approximate SQL Server solutions but don’t use COUNT(*) = out of scope

    Notes:

    COUNT(1) = COUNT(*) = COUNT(PrimaryKey) just in case

    Edit:

    SQL Server example (1.4 billion rows, 12 columns)

    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM MyBigtable WITH (NOLOCK)
    -- NOLOCK here is for me only to let me test for this answer: no more, no less
    

    1 runs, 5:46 minutes, count = 1,401,659,700

    --Note, sp_spaceused uses this DMV
    SELECT
       Total_Rows= SUM(st.row_count)
    FROM
       sys.dm_db_partition_stats st
    WHERE
        object_name(object_id) = 'MyBigtable' AND (index_id < 2)
    

    2 runs, both under 1 second, count = 1,401,659,670

    The second one has less rows = wrong. Would be the same or more depending on writes (deletes are done out of hours here)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have come across a lot of optimization tips which say that you should
I'm learning about DDD, and have come across the statement that value-objects should be
Recently I have come across a curious pattern in some code. We know that
I have come across the following type of code many a times, and I
I have come across what must be a common problem. When I have an
I have come across a quirky feature in Visual Studio and I was interested
In my work I have come across syntax like global:: (C#) or G:Loading($value) in
One of the problems I have come across having complex tasks on the browser
I am a newbie to Python and have come across the following example in
I'm learning objective-C and Cocoa and have come across this statement: The Cocoa frameworks

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.