Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6226005
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T08:56:53+00:00 2026-05-24T08:56:53+00:00

I have the following problem that I need to express. There are persons, workplaces

  • 0

I have the following problem that I need to express.

There are persons, workplaces and sites. Each person can be assigned to multiple workplaces. Each workplace can have multiple persons. Each workplace has exactly one site. So far so good. But my problem is that each person has only one workplace at a specific site.

How can I express this in an ERM?

My idea so far:

idea

I just can’t express the “one person has only one workplace at a specific site”-problem with this approach.

Implementation Solution:

Table Person with Prs_ID (PK)
Table Site with Site_ID (PK)
Table Workplace with Plc_ID (PK)
Table Person_Site with Prs_Site_PrsID (PK, FK), Prs_Site_SiteID (PK, FK), Prs_Site_PlcID (FK)
Unique Index on Prs_Site_PlcID

I think this should solve the problem.
Now how can I express this in an ERM?

Edit:

I thought it would solve the problem but it doesn’t. With this I can’t assign one workplace to two different persons, because there is a unique index on the Prs_Site_PlcID column. Back to the beginning…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T08:56:54+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 8:56 am

    enter image description here

    Note unique index Ak1 (alternate key) (SiteID, WorkplaceID) on Workplace which is propagated to PersonWorkplace.

    --
    -- PostgreSQL
    --
    create table Site      (SiteId      integer not null);
    create table Person    (PersonId    integer not null);
    create table Workplace (WorkplaceID integer not null, SiteID integer not null);
    create table PersonWorkplace
    (PersonID integer not null, SiteID integer not null, WorkplaceID integer not null);
    
    alter table Site   add constraint pk_Sit primary key (SiteID);
    alter table Person add constraint pk_Prs primary key (PersonID);
    
    alter table Workplace
      add constraint  pk_Wpl primary key (WorkplaceID)
    , add constraint fk1_Wpl foreign key (SiteId) references Site (SiteId)
    , add constraint ak1_Wpl unique (SiteID, WorkplaceID);
    
    alter table PersonWorkplace
      add constraint  pk_PrsWpl primary key (PersonId, SiteID)
    , add constraint fk1_PrsWpl foreign key (PersonId) references Person (PersonID)
    , add constraint fk2_PrsWpl foreign key (SiteID, WorkplaceID) references Workplace (SiteID, WorkplaceID);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following problem that I want to solve in awk. I have
I have the following problem that the standard library doesn't solve well, and I'm
I have the following problem that other people must have encountered. I am working
i have the following problem with that code in my html tag: <div id=searchbar><input
I have the the following problem that starts to drive me nuts. I have
I have the following problem with Tikz/Latex: I have some nodes that contain text.
i have the following problem: i would like to create a footer. that footer
I have the following problem. I want to check that the item clicked on
I have a following problem, I have HTML form that uploads a file with
I have the following function. The problem is that the $lang variable will vary

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.