Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6128269
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T16:36:28+00:00 2026-05-23T16:36:28+00:00

I have the following sql being run on an Oracle 10g database: select /*+

  • 0

I have the following sql being run on an Oracle 10g database:

select  /*+ ALL_ROWS */
       to_number(cv.old_value) as cv_id,
       to_number(job.old_value) as job_id
  from amendments,
       amnddets cv,
       amnddets job
 where amendments.table_name = 'TIMESHEET_LAYER'
   and amendments.dml_type = 'D'
   and cv.amnd_id = amendments.amnd_id 
   and cv.column_name = 'CV_ID'
   and job.amnd_id = amendments.amnd_id
   and job.column_name = 'JOB_ID';

There are the following indexes that have been created:

create index amendments_dmp_type_upper on amendments upper(dmp_type);
create index amendments_table_name_upper on amendments upper(table_name);
create index amendments_pk on amendments (amnd_id);
create index amended_column_name_idx on amnddets (column_name);
create index amnddets_amnd_id_idx on amnddets (amnd_id);

I have also tried using ANSI joins (the below sql) but this does not use the indexes either, placing upper() around the table_name and dml_type also has no affect.

The above query is taking approximately 30 – 40 secs to retrieve around 2500 rows.

I looked at the explain plan and can’t see that the index on amendments for table_name and dml_type are being used.

Explain plain for oracle joins attached

Below is the ANSI explain plan for:

select  /*+ ALL_ROWS */
       to_number(cv.old_value) as cv_id,
       to_number(job.old_value) as job_id
  from amendments
  JOIN amnddets cv on cv.amnd_id = amendments.amnd_id and cv.column_name = 'CV_ID'
  JOIN amnddets job on job.amnd_id = amendments.amnd_id and job.column_name = 'JOB_ID'
 where upper(amendments.table_name) = 'TIMESHEET_LAYER'
   and amendments.dml_type = 'D';

Explain plan for the ANSI joins

Could any one advise why the table_name, dml_type and column_name indexes aren’t being used in the above query?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T16:36:29+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 4:36 pm

    If you have actually run this as you say:

    create index amendments_dmp_type_upper on amendments upper(dmp_type);
    

    then what you have actually created is an index on amendments(dmp_type) without the upper function!

    The correct syntax is:

    create index amendments_dmp_type_upper on amendments (upper(dmp_type));
    

    Perhaps surprisingly, your statement works but the word “upper” is treated as a table alias – this works too:

    create index amendments_dmp_type_upper on amendments foo(dmp_type);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following statement being run on an oracle database. SELECT br.Number FROM
I have the following SQL-statement: SELECT DISTINCT name FROM log WHERE NOT name =
I have the following SQL query: select expr1, operator, expr2, count(*) as c from
I have a following SQL QUERY: SELECT articles.name, articles.price, users.zipcode FROM articles INNER JOIN
I have the following SQL Statement. I need to select the latest record for
I have the following sql query for transforming data but is it possible to
I have the following Transact-Sql that I am trying to convert to LINQ ...
I am debugging some code and have encountered the following SQL query (simplified version):
I have the following Linq to SQL query, in which I'm trying to do
Would the following SQL remove also the index - or does it have to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.