Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6171881
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T23:17:48+00:00 2026-05-23T23:17:48+00:00

I have this code will work in multithreaded application. I know that immutable object

  • 0

I have this code will work in multithreaded application.
I know that immutable object is thread safe because its state cannot be changed. And if we have volatile reference, if is changed with e.g.
MyImmutableObject state = MyImmutableObject.newInstance(oldState, newArgs); i.e. if a thread wants to update the state it must create new immutable object initializing it with the old state and some new state arguments) and this will be visible to all other threads.
But the question is, if a thread2 starts long operation with the state, in the middle of which thread1 updates the state with new instance, what will happen? Thread2 will use reference to the old object state i.e. it will use inconsistent state? Or thread2 will see the change made by thread1 because the reference to state is volatile, and in this case thread1 can use in the first part of its long operation the old state and in the second part the new state, which is incorrect?

State state = cache.get(); //t1 
Result result1 = DoSomethingWithState(state); //t1 
        State state = cache.get(); //t2
    ->longOperation1(state); //t1
        Result result2 = DoSomethingWithState(state); //t2
             ->longOperation1(state); //t2
   ->longOperation2(state);//t1
cache.update(result1); //t1 
             ->longOperation2(state);//t2
        cache.update(result2);//t2

Result DoSomethingWithState(State state) {
    longOperation1(state);
    //Imaging Thread1 finish here and update state, when Thread2 is going to execute next method
    longOperation2(state);
return result;
}

class cache {
     private volatile State state = State.newInstance(null, null);

    update(result) {
        this.state = State.newInstance(result.getState, result.getNewFactors);

    get(){
       return state;
    }

 }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T23:17:48+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 11:17 pm

    But the reference is volatile, isn’t it making visible the new object state … to the other threads?

    No. While a write to a volatile field happens-before every subsequent read of that field, the other thread must re-read that field to get the new value.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this piece of code in my application. I suspect that it is
I have this code in jQuery, that I want to reimplement with the prototype
I have this code that performs an ajax call and loads the results into
I have a multithreaded application that has many concurrent operations going on at once.
So I'm writing a bunch or multithreaded code in library that will run in
As the title says, will this code work and will it work in major
I have this code: chars = #some list try: indx = chars.index(chars) except ValueError:
I have this code #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main(int argc,char **argv) {
I have this code: CCalcArchive::CCalcArchive() : m_calcMap() { } m_calcMap is defined as this:
I have this code: myVariable which I want to change into trace(myVariable: + myVariable);

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.