Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8168111
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T20:24:45+00:00 2026-06-06T20:24:45+00:00

I have this function in C: static Node* newNode(void* e){ Node n={e,NULL,NULL}; return &n;

  • 0

I have this function in C:

static Node* newNode(void* e){
Node n={e,NULL,NULL};
return &n;
}

And while compiling I get the following warning that I would like to understand why it happens:

warning: function returns address of local variable [enabled by default]

What kind of dangers are lurking behind this?

Thank you

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T20:24:47+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 8:24 pm

    Local variables are destroyed when you return from a function. Accessing them after the function returned is undefined behavior, don’t do this.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a function defined like this: public static void ShowAbout(Point location, bool stripSystemAssemblies
I would like to have a mapping function that does this: public static void
I have implemented this function: static <X,Y> Y castOrNull(X obj) { try { return
I have this static callback function in MyClass, and I try to call another
I have this user defined function. public partial class UserDefinedFunctions { static int i;
Suppose I have a utility function like this - public static boolean isABlankSpace(char c)
I have a large non static JAVA function, which uses this reference at several
Suppose I have two functions which look like this: public static void myFunction1(int a,
I have this function: int firstHeapArray (IntHeapArray h) { if(!emptyHeapArray(h)) return h.array[0]; } It's
I have this as3 function public static function StringReplaceAll( source:String, find:String, replacement:String ) :

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.