Home/ Questions/Q 851055
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-15T07:22:05+00:00

I have this scenario… 1.- I’m providing a Dynamic Table for wich users can

  • 0

I have this scenario…

1.- I’m providing a “Dynamic Table” for wich users can define Fields. Each Dynamic Table will have as many rows/records as needed, but the Field definitions are centralized.

2.- My Dynamic Row/Record class was inherited from the .NET DLR DynamicObject class, and the underlying storage was a List appropriately associated to the defining fields. Everything works fine! BUT…

3.- Because I need to Serialize the content, and DynamicObject is not Serializable, I was forced to generate and carry a Dynamic Object when dynamic member access is required. But this is ugly and redundant.

So, I need to implement IDynamicMetaObjectProvider myself to achieve dynamic access and serialization together.

After googling/binging unsuccessfully I ask for your help…
Can anybody please give a good example (or related link) for doing that?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    The solution was to implement Custom Serialization.
    Implement the ISerializable interface, plus the deserialization constructor.

    It takes less time that implement IDynamicMetaObjectProvider.

    • 0