Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 887599
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T13:15:16+00:00 2026-05-15T13:15:16+00:00

I have this type of code for prototypal inheritance in Javascript. function A() {

  • 0

I have this type of code for prototypal inheritance in Javascript.

function A() {
    this.a = 1;
}
function B() {
    someEl.innerHTML(this.a);
}
B.prototype = new A();

However, I am wondering if there is a better way to do it, preferably one that brings the prototype declaration into the declaration of B.

I tried setting this.prototype in B, but it just showed this.a as undefined.

So, is there a better way to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T13:15:16+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 1:15 pm

    The prototype property should be used only in constructor functions, this.prototype doesn’t makes sense because this just the new object instance, not the constructor.

    Assign the prototype inside the constructor itself isn’t a good idea, since that assignment will be executed each time you create a new object (by new B();).

    Your code seems perfectly valid to me, the only thing that you should be aware of, is that if you replace the prototype property of a constructor, like you do it with B.prototype = new A(); the constructor property of the object instances of B, will point to A.

    Usually is recommended to restore that property, e.g.:

    function A() {
        this.a = 1;
    }
    
    function B() {
        someEl.innerHTML(this.a);
    }
    
    B.prototype = new A();
    B.prototype.constructor = B; // restore the `constructor` property
    
    var foo = new B;
    foo.constructor === B; // true
    

    Give a look to:

    • Constructors considered mildly confusing (article)
    • Setting javascript prototype function within object class declaration (SO question)
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have written some JavaScript code. It adds new function to NodeList type in
I have this code <html> <head> <script src=jquery-1.7.2.min.js type=text/javascript></script> <script src=jquery-ui-1.8.20.custom.min.js type=text/javascript></script> <script type
I have this below code and it work fine header (content-type: text/xml); $xml =
I have this code here, which is intended to allow any type of arguments:
I have this code that works well: {livre:empty_name} $.ajax({ url: sent.php, type: post, dataType:
I currently have this code which stores XML into an XML-type column called data,
I have this following code, here CssClass is of the String type. <asp:Panel ID=Panel1
i have this java code: ArrayList<MessageMap> ids = getNewMail(UserID, type, maxIdMessage); Message[] message =
I have run this Perl code: #!/usr/bin/perl print content-type: text/html \n\n; print Hello World.\n;
I have seen code like this (actually seeing another person type it up): catch

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.