Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I just ran across the following line of code:
if(someInt <= int.MinValue) { /* ... */ }
I’m wondering if I’m missing some subtlety that makes using the <= comparison better than the more intuitive == comparison?
It’s the minimum possible value of int, doesn’t seem like there is anything to miss. Go with the code that reads the most intuitively to you.