Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 949663
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T23:26:12+00:00 2026-05-15T23:26:12+00:00

I just stumbled over a small problem when extending javascript objects using jQuery. When

  • 0

I just stumbled over a small problem when extending javascript objects using jQuery. When executing

var item = $.extend(options.itemDefaults, item);

options.itemDefaults is extended with the properties that are already in item and the result is passed to item. So far, so good.

But the next time this line is executed, options.itemDefaults has all the property values that item had, instead of the original defaults. My defaults are lost!

I realize I could simply store the defaults object in a temporary variable, and extend the temporary variable instead, but it seems a bit lengthy. Is there a way to do what I’m after (overriding default values with supplied ones, taking defaults when no values are supplied, but not changing the default object) without that detour?

Update: It seems this wasn’t as easy to get around as I hoped. When I do

var defaults = options.itemDefaults;
var $item = $.extend(defaults, { attributeModel: options.attributeModel }, item);
defaults = undefined 

in each iteration, I still add properties from item on options.itemDefaults! How do I get around this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T23:26:13+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:26 pm

    Try,

    var item = $.extend(true, {}, options.itemDefaults, item);
    

    The true flag indicates that a deep copy must be made.

    We use an empty object {} as the target so the defaults are not tampered with.

    Properties of options.itemDefaults, and item will be copied into the empty object.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm just starting to learn JavaScript, and stumbled over Underscore.js and jQuery . Underscore
I just stumbled over a very interesting problem. Giving the following code: using System;
I've just started with db4o and I stumbled on to a problem. I have
I just stumbled over the following line of code cout << &Blahh << endl;
I just converted a code snippet from VB.NET to C# and stumbled over this
I just stumbled over this in some C# code...: public Foo Foo { get;
WPF DataBindings used to make me happy. One thing I've stumbled over just now
I've just stumbled upon this problem on the net. It kind of goes something
I've just started playing with Play! framework, and stumbled on such problem: modules that
Have just started playing with ASP.NET MVC and have stumbled over the following situation.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.