Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 972821
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T03:11:00+00:00 2026-05-16T03:11:00+00:00

I know that each class should to do its own job. So i always

  • 0

I know that each class should to do its own job. So i always try process my fields by only in class’s methods.If another class processing on my public fields i feel that there is something wrong but is it always right thing to make define private fields ? Would be bad design or code If i let other classes to change my public fields ?

By the way is there name about this design or term word ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T03:11:00+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 3:11 am

    This is called friend classes.

    It is not always a bad design principle, but you really have to ask yourself why you would like to expose a field directly and not through a method. If you have a good reason, then you can expose the field directly. However, in most cases such reason does not exist

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know that I can do something like $int = (int)99; //(int) has a
I know that default cron's behavior is to send normal and error output to
I know that you can insert multiple rows at once, is there a way
I know that |DataDirectory| will resolve to App_Data in an ASP.NET application but is
I know that the MsNLB can be configured to user mulitcast with IGMP. However,
I know that .NET is JIT compiled to the architecture you are running on
I know that the following is true int i = 17; //binary 10001 int
I know that just using rand() is predictable, if you know what you're doing,
I know that IList is the interface and List is the concrete type but
I know that we shouldn't being using the registry to store Application Data anymore,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.