Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8284515
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T11:08:05+00:00 2026-06-08T11:08:05+00:00

I know this question has been asked a few times and in a few

  • 0

I know this question has been asked a few times and in a few different ways. However, across all the questions and answers, no one has been able to answer completely given my situation…

I work on medical devices and they run Windows. The application runs as the shell, users shouldn’t be able to get behind the application, and ideally they wouldn’t be able to do anything that indicates that the system is running Windows. Access to the full keyboard is necessary so disabling, damaging or remapping keys is not a solution. Given that, we need to disable SAS/CAD/Ctrl+Alt+Delete in specific; some others too, but those are easy with hooks.

Up until recently we’ve been using Windows XP Embedded and could replace GINA, but we’re about to switch to Windows 7 (technically Windows Embedded Standard 7; but in our case they’re essentially the same) and GINA is no longer an option. There must be a way to do this.

Since I’ve seen comments about this on other questions: I do believe this belongs on Stack Overflow. Replacing GINA is a programming question and there’s no reason to assume this won’t be too. While I’m open to a non-programming solution, I doubt MS would make this kind of change available in the registry, etc.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T11:08:07+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 11:08 am

    Except for remapping/disabling keys, it is not possible to prevent Ctrl + Alt + Delete handling outside of kernel level code. I think this is fundamental security design feature of windows NT (and all derivatives). (Reasoning here.)

    I would suggest writing a custom keyboard filter or device driver (or looking for an existing one perhaps). Not an easy task, but doable. Example resources:

    • Keyboard Filter Driver for Windows Embedded Standard 7 – by Elbacom
    • Interception (source) – A programming interface for intercepting input device communication.
    • Writing a keyboard device driver

    That first link to the Elbacom blog, in particular, could be useful since you are also targeting windows 7 embedded.

    The second link, to Interception, is newer and might also be quite useful. It provides the kernel level module and abstracts some of the handling.

    As a possible alternative, consider that though you can’t disable the Ctrl + Alt + Delete hook without a device driver/filter, you can prevent all of the tasks that are accessible via that hook per changes to registry or with group policy editor. A previous edit of this answer linked to a utility called “Tweak Ctrl-Alt-Del Options” that made it very easy to disable all activities accessible via Ctrl-Alt-Del. That utility is no longer available from the original source, but is still find-able and there are others like it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know this question has been asked quite a few times, however, I have
I know this question has been asked before however the answers I found where
I know this kind of question has been asked a few times, but alot
I know this question has been asked here a few times before. But i
I know this question has been asked a number of different ways, and I
I know that this question has been asked many times before in different guises
I know this questions has been asked a few times here. But these seem
I know this question has been asked a few time, (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4436511/display-a-form-in-qt) I am trying
I know this question has been asked few times over SO but none of
I know this question has been asked a few times in various context, but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.