Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4624988
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T03:12:30+00:00 2026-05-22T03:12:30+00:00

I made this function: char** parse_cmd(const char* cmdline) { int i; int j =

  • 0

I made this function:

char** parse_cmd(const char* cmdline) {
    int i;
    int j = 0 ,k = 0;
    char ch[100][100];
    for(i=0; i<strlen(cmdline); i++) {
        if(cmdline[i] != ' ') {
            ch[j][k] = cmdline[i];
            k++;
        } else {
            j++;
            k = 0;
        }
    }

    return ch;
}

But when I compile the program I have this warning:

shell.c: In function ‘parse_cmd’:
shell.c:25:2: warning: return from incompatible pointer type
shell.c:25:2: warning: function returns address of local variable

Why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T03:12:30+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 3:12 am

    You try to return a pointer to a memory location that will not be associated with the array after the function returned. If you want to permanently allocate the memory, then you have to copy it with malloc (or any similar function) before returning it.

    e.g:

    char** parse_cmd(const char* cmdline) {
    int i;
    int j = 0 ,k = 0;
    char **ch = (char**)malloc(100*100);
    for(i=0; i<strlen(cmdline); i++) {
        if(cmdline[i] != ' ') {
            ch[j][k] = cmdline[i];
            k++;
        } else {
            j++;
            k = 0;
        }
    }
    return ch;
    }
    

    EDIT: fixed typo. Thanx

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a second-hand question from an OS development site, but it made me
I'm using Visual Studio C++ 2010 Express. I made this function with variable argument
When i made this function: function makeThumbnail($type, $name, $size, $tmp_name, $thumbSize) { //make sure
I've made this script that lets you navigate through multiple divs with jQuery, but
Made this custom alert box: <script type="text/javascript"> $(function () { var $alert = $('#alert');
I've made this decorator, which results in an infinite redirect loop. The problem is
Since I'm sure many people have different standard, I've made this post a community
I wonder if someone knows if there is a pre-made solution for this: I
I have roughly the following code. Could this be made nicer or more efficient?
This is something that made me doubt for a while so I thought it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.