Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 984449
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T05:01:01+00:00 2026-05-16T05:01:01+00:00

I often do sorts in Python using lambda expressions, and although it works fine,

  • 0

I often do sorts in Python using lambda expressions, and although it works fine, I find it not very readable, and was hoping there might be a better way. Here is a typical use case for me.

I have a list of numbers, e.g., x = [12, 101, 4, 56, ...]

I have a separate list of indices: y = range(len(x))

I want to sort y based on the values in x, and I do this:

y.sort(key=lambda a: x[a])

Is there a good way to do this without using lambda?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T05:01:02+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 5:01 am

    You can use the __getitem__ method of the list x. This behaves the same as your lambda and will be much faster since it is implemented as a C function instead of a python function:

    >>> x = [12, 101, 4, 56]
    >>> y = range(len(x))
    >>> sorted(y, key=x.__getitem__)
    [2, 0, 3, 1]
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am currently using Eclipse for both Java and Python (with PyDev). I often
I've used lambda expressions in other languages before using them in C#, and so
I'm writing a web application (in Python, not that it matters). One of the
I often use the excellent find program in Bash to list files with certain
Right now, I am buffering bytes using strings, StringIO, or cStringIO. But, I often
I often find myself wanting to compile an example file included in a larger
There are minor coding style changes that I often want to commit to the
I find that I'm often doing things of this sort in my Ruby code:
I often use Python to prototype ideas for other platforms, a scratch pad of
When I'm writing shell scripts, I often find myself spending most of my time

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.