Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8285373
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T11:27:11+00:00 2026-06-08T11:27:11+00:00

I saw another answer here and other places on the web that recommend using

  • 0

I saw another answer here and other places on the web that recommend using user.get_profile when extending the built-in django user. I didn’t do that in the below example. The functionality seems to be working fine, but is there a downside for not using user.get_profile()?

model

class UserProfile(models.Model):
    user = models.ForeignKey(User, primary_key=True)
    quote = models.CharField('Favorite quote', max_length =  200, null=True, blank=True)
    website = models.URLField('Personal website/blog', null=True, blank=True)

class UserProfileForm(ModelForm):
    class Meta:
        model = UserProfile
        fields = ('quote', 'website')

view

@login_required 
def user_profile(request):
    user = User.objects.get(pk=request.user.id)
    if request.method == 'POST':
        upform = UserProfileForm(request.POST)
        if upform.is_valid():
            up = upform.save(commit=False)
            up.user = request.user
            up.save()
            return HttpResponseRedirect('/accounts/profile')
    else:
        upform = UserProfileForm()
    return render_to_response('reserve/templates/edit_profile.html', locals(), context_instance=RequestContext(request))
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T11:27:12+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 11:27 am

    The code works as you’ve written it, but because you don’t pass an instance to your model it’s a bit unusual, so it might take another Django developer a bit longer to work out what’s going on.

    The view you link to instantiates the model form with an instance, so that the existing profile values are displayed in the form. In your case, you’ll get empty fields.

    upform = UserProfileForm(instance=user.get_profile())
    

    Because you don’t provide an instance, saving would try to create a new user_profile, which we wouldn’t want. That won’t happen in your case, because you’ve made user the primary key, but that’s a little unusual as well.

    The main advantage of writing user.get_profile() is that you don’t need to know which model is used for the user profile. If you are happy to hardcode UserProfile model in your code, you could put instance=UserProfile.objects.get(user=user) instead.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

So I saw an answer in another question saying that this should work: using
On another thread I saw a answer to a sql problem using Oracle's analytics.
I saw in another answer that in order to include the virtual fields you
I saw another similar question answered here - Velocity editor plugin for Eclipse? .
I saw the other topic and I'm having another problem. The process is starting
I saw someone using this in one answer: void methodA(const int*& var); I couldn't
Here is my code structure, that I saw from someone else and am trying
I saw this in an answer to another question , in reference to shortcomings
I saw another post that suggested the following: String^ clistr = gcnew String(sample); IntPtr
More specifically, how to test further? I saw another post where the answer used

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.