Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8199271
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T06:08:10+00:00 2026-06-07T06:08:10+00:00

I want to define lifting with implicits. Suppose we have a function A =>

  • 0

I want to define lifting with implicits. Suppose we have a function A => B, I want to define how to lift it to Maybe, i.e. Maybe[A] => Maybe[B].

This can be simply done with implicit conversions. However, if I want to do the same with functions with two or more parameters, I have a problem. The only solutionI know is to duplicate the code.

I want to implement such lifting for arbitrary functions with any number of parameters without duplication. Is this possible in Scala?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T06:08:11+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 6:08 am

    If F has a functor instance available, it’s possible to lift any function A => B to F[A] => F[B].

    If F has an applicative functor instance available, it’s possible to lift any function A => B => C => .. => Z to F[A] => F[B] => F[C] => .. => F[Z]. Essentially, applicative functor is a generalization of functor for arbitrary arity.

    You can learn about functor and applicative functors here and here. There is also this excellent talk which covers these ideas.

    Scalaz library provides these abstractions (and more!).

    import scalaz._
    import Scalaz._
    
    scala> val foo: Int => String = _.toString
    foo: Int => String = <function1>
    
    scala> foo.lift[Option]
    res0: Option[Int] => Option[String] = <function1>
    
    scala> res0(Some(3))
    res1: Option[String] = Some(3)
    
    scala> res0(None)
    res2: Option[String] = None
    
    scala> val add: (Int, Int) => Int = _ + _
    add: (Int, Int) => Int = <function2>
    
    scala> add.lift[Option]
    res3: (Option[Int], Option[Int]) => Option[Int] = <function2>
    
    scala> res3(Some(2), Some(1))
    res4: Option[Int] = Some(3)
    
    scala> res3(Some(2), None)
    res5: Option[Int] = None
    
    scala> res3(None, None)
    res6: Option[Int] = None
    

    Scalaz pimps lift method on Function2, Function3 etc because curried functions being syntactially heavier are used less often. Behind the scenes, the lifting happens with Function1s (i.e. curried functions).

    You might also want to take a look at Scalaz source code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to define a JavaScript class, Foo. Foo = function(value){ this.value = value;
At first sorry my bad English. I want define routing for this url: For
I want to define a generic function for printing contents of std::map like types.
I want to define functions that can be used in the fixedpoint rule. For
I want to define a following function: if(stmtToFinalize) { NSLog(@Finalizing statement stmtToFinalize); if (sqlite3_finalize(stmtToFinalize)
I want to define a jsp tag, which can accept some extra attributes which
I want to define a new function inside my RPC code. I am new
I want to define a macro that can be invoked in different places (at
I want to define a method on my application controller which I can then
I want to define an inline function in a project, compiled with c99. How

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.