Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8316725
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T21:25:27+00:00 2026-06-08T21:25:27+00:00

I was looking at the Mutex(Boolean, String) page and i’m completely confused. If i

  • 0

I was looking at the Mutex(Boolean, String) page and i’m completely confused. If i pass true how do i check if the mutex is owned by me or now? Then i saw Mutex(Boolean, String, out Boolean) and can use the 3rd param to check.

I’m extremely confused. I tested, new mutex doesnt return null or throw an exception if another process is holding the named mutex. But with the other i can check via paran. So whats the point of that constructor and Mutex(Boolean)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T21:25:29+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 9:25 pm

    If you want to create a named mutex, but don’t want to own it, it seems like the ideal overload to use:

    If name is not null and initiallyOwned is true, the calling thread owns the mutex only if the named system mutex was created as a result of this call. Since there is no mechanism for determining whether the named system mutex was created, it is better to specify false for initiallyOwned when calling this constructor overload.

    (Emphasis added)

    If you use the Mutex(Boolean) constructor creates a local mutex – one not visible outside of your program.


    It appears that the designers of this class favored consistent parameter ordering in the constructor overloads – some might have designed this particular constructor without the initiallyOwned parameter at all – just with the name. But that’s more of a stylistic choice.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Looking for a way to get path of file (and then process it in
I am new to multi-threading programming, and confused about how Mutex works. In the
I'm looking for mutex/semaphore/concurrency mechanism in shell script. Consider following situation: Unless a user
I'm looking for code shortening idea. I'm using boost::scoped_lock to lock a boost::mutex but
Suppose that a process is creating a mutex in shared memory and locking it
Looking at some assembly code for x86_64 on my Mac, I see the following
Looking to do a bit of refactoring... Using NHibernate I have this query currently
Looking for a perl one-liner what will find all words with the next pattern:
Looking at the Slickgrid examples and using Google Chrome, I'm setting a breakpoint on
Looking at the Ehcahce implementation of net.sf.cache.JS107, I am trying to achieve the following

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.