Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 462123
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T23:02:35+00:00 2026-05-12T23:02:35+00:00

I was reading the specification of Unicode @ Wikipedia ( Arabic Unicode ) and

  • 0

I was reading the specification of Unicode @ Wikipedia (Arabic Unicode)
and I see that each of the Arabic digits has 2 Unicode code points.
For example 1 is defined as U+0661 and as U+06F1.

Which one should I use?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T23:02:35+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 11:02 pm

    According to the code charts, U+0660 .. U+0669 are ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT values 0 through 9, while U+06F0 .. U+06F9 are EXTENDED ARABIC-INDIC DIGIT values 0 through 9.

    In the Unicode 3.0 book (5.2 is the current version, but these things don’t change much once set), the U+066n series of glyphs are marked ‘Arabic-Indic digits’ and the U+06Fn series of glyphs are marked ‘Eastern Arabic-Indic digits (Persian and Urdu)’.
    It also notes:

    • U+06F4 – ‘different glyphs in Persian and Urdu’
    • U+06F5 – ‘Persian and Urdu share glyph different from Arabic’
    • U+06F6 – ‘Persian glyph different from Arabic’
    • U+06F7 – ‘Urdu glyph different from Arabic’

    For comparison:

    • U+066n: ٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩
    • U+06Fn: ۰۱۲۳۴۵۶۷۸۹

    Or, enlarged by making the information into a title:

    U+066n: ٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩

    U+06Fn: ۰۱۲۳۴۵۶۷۸۹

    Or:

         U+066n    U+06Fn
    0      ٠         ۰
    1      ١         ۱
    2      ٢         ۲
    3      ٣         ۳
    4      ٤         ۴
    5      ٥         ۵
    6      ٦         ۶
    7      ٧         ۷
    8      ٨         ۸
    9      ٩         ۹
    

    (Whether you can see any of those, and how clearly they are differentiated may depend on your browser and the fonts installed on your machine as much as anything else. I can see the difference on 4 and 6 clearly; 5 looks much the same in both.)

    Based on this information, if you are working with Arabic from the Middle East, use the U+066n series of digits; if you are working with Persian or Urdu, use the U+06Fn series of digits. As a Unicode application, you should accept either set of codes as valid digits (but you might look askance at a sequence that mixed the two sets of digits – or you might just leave well alone).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

My understanding from reading the specification ( http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2445.txt ) is that the : character
Reading this question I found this as (note the quotation marks) code to solve
Reading source code of sample projects, such as Beast and Bort, are recommended as
Reading this post has left me wondering; are nightly builds ever better for a
I am reading ECMAScript Language Specification Function Calls section Can someone rephrase or detailed
I have been studying the ECMAScript specification and have found that it is extremely
Reading section 9.1 of OAuth Core 1.0, I only see a reference to performing
I was reading JavaScript: The Good Parts and the author mentions that JavaScript is
Reading an article called Increase LINQ Query Performance in July's MSDN magazine, the author
Reading over the responses to this question Disadvantages of Test Driven Development? I got

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.