I’m building an app in which I’m using Django on the backend and jQuery UI/Backbone to build the front. I’m pulling a Django-generated form into a page with jQuery.get() inside of a Backbone View. That part works fine, but now I want to add some jQuery UI stuff to the form (e.g. a datepicker, some buttons that open dialogs, etc). So, here’s the relevant code:
var InstructionForm = Backbone.View.extend({
render: function() {
var that = this;
$.get(
'/tlstats/instruction/new/',
function(data) {
var elements = $(data);
$('#id_date', elements).datepicker();
that.$el.html(elements.html());
}
};
return this;
}
});
The path /tlstats/instruction/new/ returns an HTML fragment with the form Django has generated. What’s happening is that input#id_date is getting the hasDatePicker class added and the datepicker div is appended to my <body> element (both as expected), but when I click on input#id_date, nothing happens. No datepicker widget appears, no errors in the console. Why might this be happening?
Also, somewhat off-topic, but in trying to figure this problem out on my own, I’ve come across several code examples where people are doing stuff like:
$(function() {
$('#dialog').dialog(...);
...
});
Then later:
var MyView = Backbone.View.extend({
initialize(): function() {
this.el = $('#dialog');
}
});
Isn’t this defeating the purpose of Backbone, having all that jQuery UI code completely outside any Backbone structure? Or do I misunderstand the role of Backbone?
Thanks.
I think your problem is right here:
First you bind the datepicker with
.datepicker()and then you throw it all away by converting yourelementsto an HTML string:and you put that string into
$el. When you saye.html(), you’re taking a wrapped DOM object with event bindings and everything else and turning into a simple piece of HTML in a string, that process throws away everything (such as event bindings) that isn’t simple HTML.Either give
.html()the jQuery object itself:or bind the datepicker after adding the HTML: