Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 560129
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T12:18:38+00:00 2026-05-13T12:18:38+00:00

In Java, I use if (a != null && a.fun()); by taking full advantage

  • 0

In Java, I use

if (a != null && a.fun());

by taking full advantage of short-circuit evaluation and expression are evaluated from left to right?

In C++, can I do the same? Are they guarantee to portable across different platform and compiler?

if (a != 0 && a->fun());
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T12:18:38+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:18 pm

    Yes, it is guaranteed for the “built in” types. However, if you overload && or || for your own types, short-circuited evaluation is NOT performed. For this reason, overloading these operators is considered to be a bad thing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I use threads in C as follows: pthread_t thread; if (pthread_create (& thread, NULL,
I convert the DB from Oracle to MySQL. I'm using both Java & Hibernate.
I use java and a regexp. I've made a regexp for password validation :
I use java 7, and I create a varargs method public class JavaApplicationTest {
i use java reflections to get methods used in a class.I also want to
In Java I use getters/setters when I have simple models/pojos. I find that the
In Java we use System.setProperty() method to set some system properties. According to this
When I use Java applets, they tend to be slow, don't integrate very well
Can I use java.util.Properties with encoding different then default?
Can I use Java 1.6 with WebSphere Application Server 6.1? IBM's website says no

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.