Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8261163
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T03:18:32+00:00 2026-06-08T03:18:32+00:00

IN my every database table , i have 5-6 feilds which are repetitive like

  • 0

IN my every database table , i have 5-6 feilds which are repetitive like

  1. active
  2. deleted
  3. createdAt
  4. updatedAt
  5. updatedBy
  6. createdBy

I am confused if i make separate tables for those or leave inside main table

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T03:18:34+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 3:18 am

    <opinion>I don’t think it’s be worth the extra hassle. Especially since the rows would never be shared by other rows – there will always be a 1-to-1 mapping between other rows and these rows. Just keep them in the tables where they are now. </opinion>

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have a database where every table name starts with WW. I want to
I have a database table with 10,000,000+ rows which I process to create a
I have a table in my database which has duplicate records that I want
I have two tables Team_DATA and Driver_PROFILE_DATA in an SQL database. For every driver_profile
During development of a PostgreSQL database, I made foreign keys in every table. The
I have 5 rows of data coming into my database every 2 hours from
I have a Python script that queries a MySQL database every 5 seconds, gathering
I have a thread that sends GPS coordinates to a database every six seconds
Let's say I have two tables with several fields and in every table there
I have an entity model that has audit information on every table (50+ tables)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.